IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Moral Sentiments in the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma and in Multi-Agent Systems

Listed author(s):
  • Rafael H. Bordini


    (Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul)

  • Ana L. C. Bazzan


    (Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul)

  • Rosa M. Vicari


    (Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul)

  • John A. Campbell


    (University College London)

Registered author(s):

    We present a simulation of a society of agents where some of them have moral sentiments towards the agents that belong to the same social group, using the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma as a metaphor for the social interactions. Besides the well-understood phenomenon of short-sighted, self-interested agents performing well in the short-term but ruining their chances of such performance in the long run in a world of reciprocators, the results suggest that, where some agents are more generous than that, these agents have a positive impact on the social group to which they belong, without compromising too much their individual performance (i.e., the group performance improves). The inspiration for this project comes from a discussion on Moral Sentiments by M.Ridley. We describe various simulations where conditions and parameters over determined dimensions were arranged to account for di erent types and compositions of societies. Further, we indicate several lessons that arise from the analysis of the results and comparison of the diferent experiments. We also relate this work to our previous anthropological approach to the adaptation of migrant agents, and argue that allowing agents to possess suitably-chosen emotions can have a decisive impact on Multi-Agent Systems. This implies that some common notions of agent autonomy (and related concepts) should be reexamined.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    Article provided by Department of Economics, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco in its journal Brazilian Electronic Journal of Economics.

    Volume (Year): 3 (2000)
    Issue (Month): 1 (June)

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:bej:issued:v:3:y:2000:i:1:bordini
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Av Prof. Moraes Rego, 1235 CEP: 50670-420, Recife - PE

    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    Order Information: Web: Email:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bej:issued:v:3:y:2000:i:1:bordini. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Jose Ricardo Nogueira)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.