IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdz/stlaju/v5y2026i2p72-81.html

Context Determines the Path: Comparative Analysis of Australia, Fiji and Costa Rica to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals

Author

Listed:
  • Lingxiao Liu

    (The University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia)

Abstract

This article presents a comparative study of Australia, Fiji, and Costa Rica to explore how national contexts influence the legal implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals. It contends that effective SDG governance depends on each country’s economic structure, social inequalities, environmental vulnerabilities, and institutional capacities. Australia, a high-income federal resource-exporter, uses legislated emissions targets and mandatory climate disclosures, yet its efforts are undermined by governance fragmentation and federal-state policy clashes. Fiji, a small island state facing climate threats, adopts an adaptation-focused strategy via its Climate Change Act and National Adaptation Plan, but implementation is hampered by scarce financing, weak data, and social tensions from relocations. Costa Rica, with strong ecological traditions, utilises decarbonisation plans and payments for ecosystem services, but faces enforcement deficits and unequal benefit distribution. The paper concludes that law can support SDGs only when it is locally responsive, coordinated, and socially just; otherwise, legal frameworks risk perpetuating fragmentation and inequality.

Suggested Citation

  • Lingxiao Liu, 2026. "Context Determines the Path: Comparative Analysis of Australia, Fiji and Costa Rica to Achieve Sustainable Development Goals," Studies in Law and Justice, Paradigm Academic Press, vol. 5(2), pages 72-81, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:bdz:stlaju:v:5:y:2026:i:2:p:72-81
    DOI: 10.63593/SLJ.2026.06.06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.paradigmpress.org/slj/article/view/2172/2013
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.63593/SLJ.2026.06.06?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdz:stlaju:v:5:y:2026:i:2:p:72-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.paradigmpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.