IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdz/stlaju/v5y2026i2p1-17.html

The “Train Has Stopped Again”: Common European Defense and Relations with NATO

Author

Listed:
  • Dimitris Liakopoulos

    (Director of the CEIJ, New York, US)

Abstract

The present paper aims to investigate the evolution and stages of the concept of European defense after the Treaty of Lisbon. Any reference to European security and defense policy is always an open challenge that highlights the complexities of the past in this area, as well as the present. The constant crises, the increasing and/or decreasing armaments of member states, the role of the Atlantic Alliance, the constant aggression of various states against others, the limitations of its intergovernmental system and unanimous decision-making rules are always evolving and subject to further analysis. On the other hand, the lack of strategies for member states, including those within NATO, powers like the United States and its rival China, are challenges that demonstrate the lack of true European military autonomy. An autonomy that perhaps is unnecessary given the focus on a common operational structure that places the management of external military missions within the framework of European defense integration, viewing it as a stage in the Union’s ongoing evolution.

Suggested Citation

  • Dimitris Liakopoulos, 2026. "The “Train Has Stopped Again”: Common European Defense and Relations with NATO," Studies in Law and Justice, Paradigm Academic Press, vol. 5(2), pages 1-17, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdz:stlaju:v:5:y:2026:i:2:p:1-17
    DOI: 10.63593/SLJ.2026.06.01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.paradigmpress.org/slj/article/view/2089/1946
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.63593/SLJ.2026.06.01?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdz:stlaju:v:5:y:2026:i:2:p:1-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.paradigmpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.