IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdz/stlaju/v4y2025i6p49-59.html

An Assessment of the Role the Land Consultative Board in the Resolution of Land Disputes in Cameroon

Author

Listed:
  • Dr. Akwe Ngole Ray Junior

    (Magistrate and a Lecturer in Law, Cameroon)

Abstract

Land disputes in Cameroon persist as a major threat to governance and social stability, driven by tensions between statutory law and customary tenure. To address these conflicts, the Land Consultative Board (LCB) was created as an administrative and advisory body for dispute resolution, especially in cases of land registration and competing claims. This study critically evaluates the LCB’s legal foundation, functions, and effectiveness through doctrinal analysis of legislation, regulations, case law, and scholarly literature. Findings show that while the LCB is pivotal in promoting procedural legality, mediating claims, and bridging statutory–customary divides, its impact is undermined by its non‑binding authority, weak institutional capacity, and poor integration into the broader justice framework. The study argues that strengthening the LCB through legal reforms, clearer recognition of customary claims, enhanced institutional resources, and stakeholder coordination is essential for building efficient, equitable, and sustainable land governance in Cameroon.

Suggested Citation

  • Dr. Akwe Ngole Ray Junior, 2025. "An Assessment of the Role the Land Consultative Board in the Resolution of Land Disputes in Cameroon," Studies in Law and Justice, Paradigm Academic Press, vol. 4(6), pages 49-59, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdz:stlaju:v:4:y:2025:i:6:p:49-59
    DOI: 10.63593/SLJ.2025.12.05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.paradigmpress.org/slj/article/view/1936/1785
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.63593/SLJ.2025.12.05?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdz:stlaju:v:4:y:2025:i:6:p:49-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.paradigmpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.