Author
Abstract
The doctor-patient relationship is a type of civil legal relationship. Under normal circumstances, it is a contractual relationship based on the complete free will of both parties. In this relationship, patients voluntarily seek medical assistance from doctors, who in turn willingly accept them as patients. As one of the most important interpersonal relationships, the doctor-patient relationship is characterized by mutual interdependence and inseparability. Doctors exist and grow because of patients, and medical science advances in response to diseases—without patients, doctors would lose the foundation of their professional survival. On the other hand, patients suffering from illnesses rely on doctors’ treatment to overcome diseases and regain health; without doctors’ professional help, the protection of patients’ health and lives would lack an effective safeguard. It can be said that patients are the “bread and butter” of doctors, while doctors are the messengers who help patients recover their health. Ideally, doctors and patients should maintain a relationship of mutual trust and harmonious coexistence. However, the conflicts in the doctor-patient relationship that have emerged in recent years have led to an increasing number of medical dispute cases, revealing that the tension between doctors and patients still persists. In recent years, hospitals across the country have adopted various measures to improve their technical standards and medical quality, and strengthen the management of medical safety. Nevertheless, medical disputes and controversies still occur from time to time. These incidents seriously disrupt the normal order of medical work and activities, damage the legitimate rights and interests of medical institutions, medical staff and patients, and also undermine social harmony and stability. To further enhance the effectiveness of preventing and resolving medical disputes, hospitals have been continuously exploring experience in dispute handling and promoting a diversified dispute resolution mechanism. Administrative mediation of medical disputes is an important channel for settling such conflicts, and it is bound to play an even greater role in resolving medical disputes.
Suggested Citation
Dongchuan Lai, 2025.
"On the Construction of Administrative Mediation for Medical Disputes,"
Studies in Law and Justice, Paradigm Academic Press, vol. 4(6), pages 26-39, December.
Handle:
RePEc:bdz:stlaju:v:4:y:2025:i:6:p:26-39
DOI: 10.63593/SLJ.2025.12.03
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdz:stlaju:v:4:y:2025:i:6:p:26-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.paradigmpress.org/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.