Author
Abstract
Community public spaces serve as essential venues for the daily activities of urban residents, and their level of vitality directly affects the quality of the living environment and the sustainability of urban development. To scientifically evaluate the vitality of community public spaces and propose targeted optimization strategies, this study integrates deep learning techniques with multi-source street view data to construct a vitality perception evaluation framework focusing on five core dimensions: aesthetics, recognizability, functionality, comfort, and safety. Taking two representative neighborhoods in Shanghai—one in the city center and one in the suburban area—as case studies, the research employs visual semantic segmentation to perform pixel-level analysis of street view samples, quantifying the proportions of spatial elements such as buildings, greenery, roads, and public facilities. These data are then combined with Point of Interest (POI) information for kernel density and diversity analyses. The results show that central urban neighborhoods perform better in pedestrian paving, street furniture, POI density, and road accessibility, indicating a higher overall vitality perception level. In contrast, suburban neighborhoods exhibit slight advantages in traffic signage but generally suffer from lower green visibility, encroached pedestrian spaces, and insufficient green and environmental facilities, which constrain spatial vitality. The findings suggest that both types of neighborhoods insufficiently address user experience. Accordingly, this study proposes four renewal strategies—enhancing walkability, improving environmental attractiveness, enriching functional services, and strengthening safety perception—to maximize the effectiveness of public space use and provide a scientific basis for the optimization of urban living environments.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdz:starac:v:4:y:2025:i:4:p:1-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.paradigmpress.org/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.