Author
Listed:
- Qiuyi Li
(Cheongju University, Cheongju, South Korea)
- Xueqing Liang
(Cheongju University, Cheongju, South Korea)
Abstract
In recent years, Chinese-language crime films have increasingly embraced hybrid genres, not only borrowing visual elements from film noir and action cinema, but also challenging conventional moral binaries through innovative narrative structures and complex characterizations. The Pig, the Snake and the Pigeon (2023), a film that sparked significant discussion, tells a mythic story of “redemption through destruction” through a self-destructive antihero, Chen Guilin. Once a notorious fugitive, Chen embarks on a violent mission to eliminate three societal “evils” after discovering that he is not the most wanted criminal — only to ultimately realize that he himself is the third target. This paper argues that the film does not merely subvert the traditional justice narrative but constructs a culturally resonant myth through its symbolic use of death and cyclical narrative structure. Through the lens of narrative theory, mythology, and religious-cultural discourse, the film’s treatment of death functions not only as an endpoint but as a ritualized process of purification, heavily influenced by Buddhist concepts of karma and reincarnation. The analysis focuses on how Chen’s path — marked by violence, hallucinations, and eventual self-sacrifice — transforms him from a criminal into a mythic figure representing social catharsis and existential rebirth. By examining this “self-destructive hero myth,” the study reveals how contemporary Chinese-language cinema reimagines heroism in a context of moral ambiguity, institutional failure, and spiritual longing. The paper concludes by reflecting on how death, in such narratives, becomes the only meaningful gesture in a disenchanted world — a culturally coded form of redemption.
Suggested Citation
Qiuyi Li & Xueqing Liang, 2025.
"The Self-Destructive Hero Myth: Death Narrative and the Structure of Reincarnation in The Pig, the Snake and the Pigeon,"
Studies in Social Science & Humanities, Paradigm Academic Press, vol. 4(2), pages 67-71, March.
Handle:
RePEc:bdz:ssosch:v:4:y:2025:i:2:p:67-71
DOI: 10.56397/SSSH.2025.03.09
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdz:ssosch:v:4:y:2025:i:2:p:67-71. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.paradigmpress.org/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.