IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdz/ssosch/v4y2025i2p58-66.html

The Loss Aversion Effect in Blind Box Purchases: Why Are Consumers More Willing to Make Additional Purchases?

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoyu Feng

    (Wuhan University, Wuhan, China)

Abstract

This paper investigates the loss aversion effect in blind box purchases and why consumers are more willing to make additional purchases within the Chinese market context. By examining psychological principles such as loss aversion, fear of missing out (FOMO), and the Zeigarnik Effect, the study explores how these factors interact with the unique mechanics of blind box marketing. The influence of randomness, rarity, and collectability is analyzed to understand how consumer behavior is shaped by emotional triggers and cognitive biases. Marketing strategies employed by companies to leverage loss aversion, including limited editions, countdown promotions, and reward systems, are discussed in detail. Furthermore, the study highlights the paradox of consumer satisfaction, where disappointment does not necessarily reduce consumption due to post-purchase rationalization and cognitive dissonance. Future implications are considered, including ethical concerns about the exploitation of psychological principles and the potential for stricter regulations. The findings suggest that companies need to balance profitability with ethical responsibility to sustain long-term growth in the blind box market.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoyu Feng, 2025. "The Loss Aversion Effect in Blind Box Purchases: Why Are Consumers More Willing to Make Additional Purchases?," Studies in Social Science & Humanities, Paradigm Academic Press, vol. 4(2), pages 58-66, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdz:ssosch:v:4:y:2025:i:2:p:58-66
    DOI: 10.56397/SSSH.2025.03.08
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.paradigmpress.org/SSSH/article/view/1580/1409
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.56397/SSSH.2025.03.08?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdz:ssosch:v:4:y:2025:i:2:p:58-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.paradigmpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.