IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdz/ssosch/v3y2024i7p26-32.html

Ethical Disputes over Freebies and Gifts in Journalism Practice: An Analysis of 133 Media Ethics Codes

Author

Listed:
  • Yifei Zhao

    (School of Journalism and New Media, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, China)

  • Jing Niu

    (School of Journalism and Information Communication, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China)

Abstract

How do media ethics codes regulate journalists’ treatment of freebies in relation to the public’s right to journalism? This study examines 133 media ethics codes from 87 countries and regions. The analysis reveals that most codes overlook the issue of freebies in daily news practice. Among the 133 codes, 49 explicitly address freebies, with varying degrees of specificity, generally categorized into absolute prohibition, relative prohibition, and intermediate attitudes. Ethical codes need more explicit guidance on how journalists should handle freebies to ensure consistency on this issue. Additionally, the normative guidance on freebies requires greater operational feasibility. To enhance the effectiveness of ethical codes in journalism practice, this paper proposes incorporating the principles of bottom line, relevance, and openness in the discussion and revision of ethics codes.

Suggested Citation

  • Yifei Zhao & Jing Niu, 2024. "Ethical Disputes over Freebies and Gifts in Journalism Practice: An Analysis of 133 Media Ethics Codes," Studies in Social Science & Humanities, Paradigm Academic Press, vol. 3(7), pages 26-32, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:bdz:ssosch:v:3:y:2024:i:7:p:26-32
    DOI: 10.56397/SSSH.2024.07.04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.paradigmpress.org/SSSH/article/view/1213/1074
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.56397/SSSH.2024.07.04?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdz:ssosch:v:3:y:2024:i:7:p:26-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.paradigmpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.