IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdz/ssosch/v3y2024i3p46-51.html

A Critique of Feuerbach’s Anthropological Thought in the German Ideology

Author

Listed:
  • Xinghui Chen

    (School of Marxism, Party School of the CPC Beijing Committee, Beijing, China)

Abstract

The German Ideology is often seen as a sign of Marx’s creation of a new worldview, the so-called new worldview, which is the materialism of practice and history, i.e., the materialist conception of history. In the first chapter “Feuerbach” chapter, Marx criticized against Feuerbach’s anthropological thought based on the old materialism. In terms of anthropological thought, Feuerbach understood human beings as abstract beings as “classes”, while Marx pointed out that human beings are “real human beings”. This critique is not only important for the formation of the materialist conception of history, but also has many guiding values for the path of human emancipation in reality.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinghui Chen, 2024. "A Critique of Feuerbach’s Anthropological Thought in the German Ideology," Studies in Social Science & Humanities, Paradigm Academic Press, vol. 3(3), pages 46-51, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bdz:ssosch:v:3:y:2024:i:3:p:46-51
    DOI: 10.56397/SSSH.2024.03.08
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.paradigmpress.org/SSSH/article/view/1072/940
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.56397/SSSH.2024.03.08?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdz:ssosch:v:3:y:2024:i:3:p:46-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.paradigmpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.