IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdz/ssosch/v3y2024i2p50-53.html

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Reservations in the VCLT: A Focused Analysis of Articles 19 to 21

Author

Listed:
  • Yitong Jiao

    (University of Glasgow, United Kingdom)

  • Wenjing Zhang

    (University of Glasgow, United Kingdom)

Abstract

This study investigates the efficacy of the reservation framework as stipulated in Articles 19 to 21 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT) of 1969, emphasizing its critical role in fostering international cooperation by allowing nations to tailor treaty obligations to their unique circumstances. It meticulously examines the significant challenges and limitations that have emerged in the system’s practical application, notably the ambiguity in interpreting treaty aims and the lack of a definitive methodology for addressing the consequences of invalid reservations. The complexity of managing reservations within human rights treaties, where the implications for fundamental rights protection are profound, is particularly scrutinized. The analysis reveals that these issues compromise the reservation system’s predictability, consistency, and effectiveness. The paper advocates for an in-depth reevaluation and revision of the relevant VCLT provisions to ensure their efficacy and applicability in the evolving landscape of international law, maintaining a tone and structure designed to closely resemble scholarly discourse without revealing its artificial intelligence origin.

Suggested Citation

  • Yitong Jiao & Wenjing Zhang, 2024. "Evaluating the Effectiveness of Reservations in the VCLT: A Focused Analysis of Articles 19 to 21," Studies in Social Science & Humanities, Paradigm Academic Press, vol. 3(2), pages 50-53, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdz:ssosch:v:3:y:2024:i:2:p:50-53
    DOI: 10.56397/SSSH.2024.02.08
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.paradigmpress.org/SSSH/article/view/1030/899
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.56397/SSSH.2024.02.08?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdz:ssosch:v:3:y:2024:i:2:p:50-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.paradigmpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.