Author
Listed:
- Liang Junlong
(Environmental Public Health and Management Program, Faculty of Science, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong SAR, China)
- Leung Anna Oi Wah
(Environmental Public Health and Management Program, Faculty of Science, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong SAR, China)
Abstract
Currently, the production of electric vehicles and the lithium batteries that powers them is increasing significantly. Thus, this dissertation combines the literature review approach and the life cycle assessment (LCA) method to investigate the environmental or social impact of lithium batteries for electric vehicles from cradle to grave. According to the literature review, the environmental impacts of lithium batteries include carbon dioxide and harmful electrolyte emissions, water pollution, air pollution, solid waste emissions, gaseous pollutants, volatile organic compounds, nitrogen oxides, heavy metals, organic pollutants, particulate matter and CO2 emissions. Therefore, lithium batteries for electric vehicles pose a great environmental concern. In addition, the confusion surrounding the definition of lithium batteries in LCA can pose a significant concern. The in-depth analysis reveals that there is a lack of uniform data on EV lithium batteries, a low recycling rate of lithium batteries, and a lack of waste stream management. There is no uniformity in the technology and development of lithium batteries among countries such as China, Canada, and the USA. As a result, the secondary data may only represent this region. Besides, the literature consulted covers a long period of time. There is little possibility that the negative environmental impact of earlier technology like the burning of lithium batteries in incinerators can now be improved. Moreover, lithium batteries are still in the development stage. Therefore, there is still room for potential development in the future.
Suggested Citation
Liang Junlong & Leung Anna Oi Wah, 2023.
"A Critical Review on Electric Vehicle Batteries — Based on Life Cycle Assessment Method,"
Studies in Social Science & Humanities, Paradigm Academic Press, vol. 2(8), pages 33-50, August.
Handle:
RePEc:bdz:ssosch:v:2:y:2023:i:8:p:33-50
DOI: 10.56397/SSSH.2023.08.05
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdz:ssosch:v:2:y:2023:i:8:p:33-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.paradigmpress.org/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.