IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdz/ssosch/v2y2023i3p28-36.html

A Policy Review on Sustainability and the Three Gorges Dam in China

Author

Listed:
  • Langqiu Zhao

    (University College London (UCL), London, WC1E 6BT United Kingdom)

Abstract

The construction of large dams has become a controversial environmental issue around the world. The Three Gorges Dam on the Yangtze River in China is by far the largest hydroelectric power plant in the world. Supporters of the project argue that it would help control catastrophic flooding along the Yangtze River, provide much-needed electricity to the central region of China along the river, and enhance the economic advantage of the interior. The most important role is for the dam to act as an important power station and reservoir in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River, as it will not only solve natural disasters, such as floods and mudslides, but also promote economic development in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River through power generation. The dam is also intended to protect millions of people from periodic flooding along the Yangtze River, although there has been debate about its effectiveness. However, the dam has also caused damage to ecological and wildlife habitats, archaeological and cultural sites, and the displacement of millions of people.

Suggested Citation

  • Langqiu Zhao, 2023. "A Policy Review on Sustainability and the Three Gorges Dam in China," Studies in Social Science & Humanities, Paradigm Academic Press, vol. 2(3), pages 28-36, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdz:ssosch:v:2:y:2023:i:3:p:28-36
    DOI: 10.56397/SSSH.2023.03.05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.paradigmpress.org/SSSH/article/view/485/422
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.56397/SSSH.2023.03.05?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdz:ssosch:v:2:y:2023:i:3:p:28-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.paradigmpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.