IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdz/ssosch/v1y2022i3p89-92.html

Analyzing Gender Roles in Housework Norms from a Quantitative Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Yuansi Li

    (Shanghai World Foreign Language Academy)

Abstract

Social expectations stemming from obsolete stereotypical ideologies have forced numerous wives and mothers to undertake disproportionately more housework than their male counterparts. In this paper, we aim to evaluate the economic aspect of the intrinsic value of uncompensated housework by analyzing a recent dataset from China as a representative example with the largest population and the many disparities coming from it. The quantitative analysis is achieved via two rigorous approaches: calculating the average economic value created by unpaid housework and creating a gender index to compare different levels of gender equality in the household globally. Scientific analysis based on statistical models could lay a firm foundation to shift out-of-date social norms and largely motivate national authorities to establish more women-friendly policies for gender inequality in household or work settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuansi Li, 2022. "Analyzing Gender Roles in Housework Norms from a Quantitative Perspective," Studies in Social Science & Humanities, Paradigm Academic Press, vol. 1(3), pages 89-92, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdz:ssosch:v:1:y:2022:i:3:p:89-92
    DOI: 10.56397/SSSH.2022.10.09
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.paradigmpress.org/SSSH/article/view/263/230
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.56397/SSSH.2022.10.09?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdz:ssosch:v:1:y:2022:i:3:p:89-92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.paradigmpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.