Author
Abstract
Sustainable development, as crystallized in major international legal and policy instruments, is contingent upon the coexistence of economic advancement, social justice, environmental protection, peace, and institutional stability. Despite the measures put in place for the promotion of sustainable development in Cameroon, the protracted Anglophone conflict has gravely affected the practical efficacy of these mechanisms. The crisis has led to widespread destruction of social infrastructure, aggravated poverty, displacement, and human rights violations, disrupted access to education and healthcare, and occasioned serious violations of fundamental human rights. These consequences are incompatible with the essential preconditions for sustainable development and have rendered its attainment in the affected regions ineffective. Although the State has adopted various initiatives, including the Grand National Dialogue, special status arrangements, reconstruction programs, and DDR mechanisms, these responses have not yielded a sufficiently coherent, inclusive, and enforceable framework capable of addressing the root causes of the crisis and restoring the conditions necessary for sustainable recovery. The study concludes that sustainable development in the English-speaking regions of Cameroon will remain more theoretical than real unless peacebuilding, accountability, human rights protection is treated as indispensable components of the development process. It therefore advocates a more rights-based, conflict-sensitive, and justice-oriented legal approach as the necessary foundation for meaningful and enduring sustainability in the affected regions.
Suggested Citation
Mofor Sandra Ning, 2026.
"A Legal Assessment of the Effects of the Conflict in the English-Speaking Regions of Cameroon on Sustainable Development,"
Law and Economy, Paradigm Academic Press, vol. 5(2), pages 44-56, June.
Handle:
RePEc:bdz:laweco:v:5:y:2026:i:2:p:44-56
DOI: 10.63593/LE.2788-7049.2026.06.005
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdz:laweco:v:5:y:2026:i:2:p:44-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.paradigmpress.org/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.