Author
Abstract
The green energy transition faces three major financing bottlenecks: insufficient collateral, residual value volatility, and rapid technological iteration. Traditional credit and bond instruments have significant limitations in covering light-asset projects. This paper constructs a triple-layer credit enhancement structure of “direct lease + equity pledge + cash flow supervision,” incorporating shareholders’ residual claims into the seizable asset pool. Based on option pricing theory, the optimal equity pledge ratio is derived to be between 8% and 12%. Taking the 2 billion yuan energy storage project in Ningxia Baofeng as a typical case, this model achieves a 2.3 percentage point reduction in financing costs, a 6-month shorter construction period, and zero overdue payments. A quantitative analysis of 128 green leasing projects from 2019 to 2024 indicates that the equity pledge ratio has a significant inverse U-shaped relationship with the project’s non-performing rate, with the curve’s inflection point at 10.2%. For every 10 percentage point increase in the cash flow supervision ratio, the financing cost can be further reduced by 0.5 percentage points (Luo, M., Du, B., Zhang, W., Song, T., Li, K., Zhu, H., ... & Wen, H., 2023). A comparison of the systems in China and the United States shows that differences in registration time, liquidation speed, appraisal standards, and tax incentives can account for 70% of the cross-border funding cost gap. This paper proposes policy recommendations such as establishing a five-day green channel for equity pledge, jointly building a dynamic database for technological residual value, and promoting mutual recognition of leasing standards, providing replicable and scalable solutions for green leasing to support the global carbon neutrality goal.
Suggested Citation
Sheng Zhang, 2025.
"Application and Risk Mitigation of the “Direct Lease + Equity Pledge” Model in the Green Energy Sector,"
Law and Economy, Paradigm Academic Press, vol. 4(9), pages 44-50, October.
Handle:
RePEc:bdz:laweco:v:4:y:2025:i:9:p:44-50
DOI: 10.63593/LE.2788-7049.2025.10.005
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdz:laweco:v:4:y:2025:i:9:p:44-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.paradigmpress.org/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.