IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdz/laweco/v4y2025i9p35-43.html

Review of Procuratorial Recommendations as a Mechanism for Environmental Administrative Public Interest Litigation

Author

Listed:
  • Wenping Yuan

    (Guangxi University of Foreign Languages, Nanning, Guangxi 530222, China)

Abstract

The prosecutorial recommendation system for environmental administrative public interest litigation represents a significant innovation in the procuratorial organs’ fulfillment of their legal supervisory responsibilities. This article reviews relevant research and analyzes its development and challenges from the perspectives of institutional attributes, procedural rules, and practical difficulties. The research concludes that while this system combines pre-litigation procedural and independent oversight, it has become a relatively complete system. However, it still faces challenges such as insufficient rigidity, ambiguous standards, and poor coordination. Future efforts should strengthen its legalization, refinement, and coordination to promote its greater role in the rule of law for ecological civilization.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenping Yuan, 2025. "Review of Procuratorial Recommendations as a Mechanism for Environmental Administrative Public Interest Litigation," Law and Economy, Paradigm Academic Press, vol. 4(9), pages 35-43, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:bdz:laweco:v:4:y:2025:i:9:p:35-43
    DOI: 10.63593/LE.2788-7049.2025.10.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.paradigmpress.org/le/article/view/1832/1671
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.63593/LE.2788-7049.2025.10.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdz:laweco:v:4:y:2025:i:9:p:35-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.paradigmpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.