IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdz/laweco/v4y2025i7p60-72.html

Criminalization of “Genital Mutilation” in Cameroon: The Inadequacy of the Criminal Law

Author

Listed:
  • Mikano Emmanuel KIYE

    (Department of English Law, University of Buea, Cameroon)

Abstract

This paper addresses the inadequacies of the criminal law in eradicating FGM in Cameroon. It adopts a qualitative methodology grounded in doctrinal studies and based on the interpretation of primary and secondary data. FGM is entrenched in some regions of Cameroon and has met with a variety of responses from the state ranging from sensitization campaigns to outright criminalization. “Genital mutilation” was explicitly penalized under section 277-1 following the amendment of the Penal Code in 2019. The euphoria that greeted this initiative is questionable as the implementation of the provision has largely been ineffective. The complexity of the practice, the absence of political will on the part of the state, and the non-proactive approach of the criminal law are among the factors that have rendered ineffective the criminal law. Consequently, incidences of the practice increased during the era of the COVID-19 pandemic with devastating effects on victims. The eradication of the practice requires an approach that goes beyond the purview of the criminal law, which in its current form, remains a weak link in the fight against the scourge.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikano Emmanuel KIYE, 2025. "Criminalization of “Genital Mutilation” in Cameroon: The Inadequacy of the Criminal Law," Law and Economy, Paradigm Academic Press, vol. 4(7), pages 60-72, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdz:laweco:v:4:y:2025:i:7:p:60-72
    DOI: 10.63593/LE.2788-7049.2025.08.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.paradigmpress.org/le/article/view/1762/1592
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.63593/LE.2788-7049.2025.08.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdz:laweco:v:4:y:2025:i:7:p:60-72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.paradigmpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.