IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdz/jouwec/v4y2025i6p83-98.html

Research on the Protection Path of Minority Shareholders’ Rights and Interests Under the Mandatory Delisting System

Author

Listed:
  • Min Yang

    (Guangzhou Huashang College, Guangzhou, Guangdong 511300, China)

  • Yanxiu Zhou

    (Guangzhou Huashang College, Guangzhou, Guangdong 511300, China)

Abstract

With the continuous development of the capital market, the mandatory delisting system has become an important means to maintain market health. Since the implementation of the Opinions on Strictly Implementing the Delisting System, the number of listed enterprises subject to mandatory delisting has increased sharply, significantly enhancing the market’s capacity for clearing out inefficient entities. However, the issue of minority shareholders’ rights and interests being impaired during the delisting process has become increasingly prominent, making the protection of these rights a major social concern. Taking the mandatory delisting case of Guanghui Automotive, whose stock closed below 1 yuan for 20 consecutive trading days, as the research object, this paper explores the internal and external causes of the company’s mandatory delisting against the backdrop of the current delisting system. It further analyzes the root causes of the infringement on minority shareholders’ rights and interests, and proposes targeted counter-measures including improving the information disclosure system, strengthening accounting supervision, implementing compensation mechanisms, perfecting the representative litigation system, and enhancing investor education. This study aims to provide theoretical support and practical reference for protecting minority shareholders’ rights and interests under the capital market delisting system, and promote the construction of a more fair, transparent, and efficient capital market environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Min Yang & Yanxiu Zhou, 2025. "Research on the Protection Path of Minority Shareholders’ Rights and Interests Under the Mandatory Delisting System," Journal of World Economy, Paradigm Academic Press, vol. 4(6), pages 83-98, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdz:jouwec:v:4:y:2025:i:6:p:83-98
    DOI: 10.63593/JWE.2025.12.11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.paradigmpress.org/JWE/article/view/1935/1784
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.63593/JWE.2025.12.11?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdz:jouwec:v:4:y:2025:i:6:p:83-98. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.paradigmpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.