Author
Listed:
- Congshan Dai
(School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University Taikang Medical College, Hubei Provincial Government-Affiliated Hospital (Hubei Provincial Rehabilitation Hospital), Wuhan, China)
- Qi Chen
(School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University Taikang Medical College, Wuhan, China)
- Qianqian Zhang
(School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University Taikang Medical College, Wuhan, China)
- Wanhong Liu
(School of Basic Medical Sciences, Wuhan University Taikang Medical College, Wuhan, China)
- Wenguang Xia
(The Affiliated Hospital of Hubei Provincial Government (Hubei Rehabilitation Hospital), Hubei Provincial Neuroregulation Technology Engineering Research Center, Wuhan, China)
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to screen for indicators that significantly differ between Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) and Control Group (HC) through combined detection of multiple blood biomarkers, and to explore and construct a Random Forest model using these indicators as feature parameters to attempt to predict the occurrence of MCI. Methods: This study involved 83 elderly participants. All participants met the inclusion criteria and signed informed consent. Blood samples were collected from the subjects via fasting venipuncture between 7:00 and 9:00 am, then immediately centrifuged for analysis or stored at -80°C. Subsequently, cognitive status was assessed using neuropsychological scales, and blood biomarkers were analyzed. Information such as age, gender, height, and weight of the subjects was recorded. Results: A comparison of basic subject information and blood biomarker differences between the MCI and HC groups revealed significant differences in age (P=0.027) and white blood cell count (WBC) (P=0.017). Therefore, Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was used to eliminate age differences, leaving 56 subjects. The results showed significant differences in TAT (P=0.017), TG (P=0.035), WBC (P=0.003), and P-Tau181 (P=0.042). Based on the post-PSM differential data, TAT, TG, WBC, and Tau181 were used as feature parameters to construct a Random Forest model for predicting MCI. The model demonstrated excellent performance in 10-fold cross-validation, achieving an accuracy of 87.5%, sensitivity of 85.7%, and specificity of 89.3%. Additionally, the model’s Area Under the Curve-Receiver Operating Characteristic (AUC-ROC) value was 0.92. Conclusion: The Random Forest model constructed through blood multi-biomarker detection can effectively predict the occurrence of Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), indicating that the combination of blood biomarkers and machine learning methods has significant potential in the early screening of MCI, providing theoretical and practical support for the development of non-invasive and efficient MCI prediction tools in the future.
Suggested Citation
Congshan Dai & Qi Chen & Qianqian Zhang & Wanhong Liu & Wenguang Xia, 2025.
"Exploratory Construction of a Random Forest Prediction Model for Mild Cognitive Impairment Through Combined Detection of Multiple Blood Biomarkers and Machine Learning,"
Journal of Innovations in Medical Research, Paradigm Academic Press, vol. 4(4), pages 54-62, August.
Handle:
RePEc:bdz:joimer:v:4:y:2025:i:4:p:54-62
DOI: 10.63593/JIMR.2788-7022.2025.08.009
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdz:joimer:v:4:y:2025:i:4:p:54-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.paradigmpress.org/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.