IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdz/joimer/v3y2024i1p45-53.html

Comparative Analysis of Imaging Modalities for Diagnosing Musculoskeletal Disorders

Author

Listed:
  • Weiwei Chen

    (Fenyang College of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi, China)

  • Yujie Zhang

    (Fenyang College of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi, China)

  • Xin Wang

    (Fenyang College of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi, China)

  • Jingyi Liu

    (Fenyang College of Shanxi Medical University, Shanxi, China)

Abstract

Imaging modalities are essential for diagnosing and treating musculoskeletal disorders. This paper provides a comparative analysis of various imaging modalities, including X-ray, MRI, CT scan, and ultrasound, highlighting their strengths, limitations, and clinical applications. Case studies and clinical examples demonstrate the use of these modalities in different scenarios, illustrating their impact on diagnosis and treatment outcomes. The cost-effectiveness and accessibility of each modality are compared, discussing how these factors influence their use in clinical practice. Recent technological advancements, such as AI integration and portable ultrasound devices, are also discussed for their potential to improve diagnosis and patient outcomes. Challenges in musculoskeletal imaging, including cost, radiation exposure, and interpretation variability, are identified, and future research directions to address these challenges are suggested. Overall, this paper provides valuable insights into the current state and future trends of imaging modalities in diagnosing musculoskeletal disorders.

Suggested Citation

  • Weiwei Chen & Yujie Zhang & Xin Wang & Jingyi Liu, 2024. "Comparative Analysis of Imaging Modalities for Diagnosing Musculoskeletal Disorders," Journal of Innovations in Medical Research, Paradigm Academic Press, vol. 3(1), pages 45-53, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:bdz:joimer:v:3:y:2024:i:1:p:45-53
    DOI: 10.56397/JIMR/2024.03.06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.paradigmpress.org/jimr/article/view/1073/941
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.56397/JIMR/2024.03.06?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdz:joimer:v:3:y:2024:i:1:p:45-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.paradigmpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.