Author
Abstract
Chemical production customer audits face intractable challenges, including heterogeneous audit standards, inefficient manual responses, and inadequate handling of complex cross-standard issues. Traditional manual response models have struggled to meet the evolving demands of high-stakes supply chain audits. This study integrates 236 heterogeneous audit standards from 127 core customers—including industry leaders such as Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Limited (CATL) and Tesla—to construct a ternary knowledge graph (TKG) centered on “process parameters-quality indicators-compliance clauses.” An NLP-driven intelligent response system was developed to enable rapid semantic understanding, precise knowledge retrieval, and standardized response generation for audit queries. Comprehensive validation, including laboratory testing and 12 months of industrial application, demonstrates that the system achieves a question matching accuracy of 91.3%, reduces response time from 48 hours (traditional manual) to 15 minutes, and supports 27 customer audits with a 100% pass rate. The complex issue resolution rate reaches 89.6%, significantly reducing enterprise audit costs and compliance risks. The proposed technical framework effectively addresses the core pain points of multi-customer heterogeneous standard integration and intelligent audit response, providing a replicable technical pathway for audit management in the chemical industry and offering practical insights for the application of knowledge graphs and NLP in industrial compliance scenarios.
Suggested Citation
Xinshun Liu, 2025.
"Construction and Efficacy Evaluation of an Intelligent Response System for Chemical Production Customer Audits Based on Knowledge Graphs,"
Innovation in Science and Technology, Paradigm Academic Press, vol. 4(10), pages 22-28, November.
Handle:
RePEc:bdz:inscte:v:4:y:2025:i:10:p:22-28
DOI: 10.63593/IST.2788-7030.2025.11.004
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdz:inscte:v:4:y:2025:i:10:p:22-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.paradigmpress.org/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.