Author
Abstract
Chronic soft tissue pain has brought a heavy global social and economic burden, while conventional treatments have obvious limitations in efficacy and safety. Traditional Chinese Medicine external therapies (TETs) including cupping, scraping and moxibustion are widely used clinically, yet inconsistent operation standards lead to high research heterogeneity and poor repeatability. This multicenter observational study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety, dose-response relationship and cost-effectiveness of standardized TETs for chronic soft tissue pain, and explore the influencing factors of therapeutic effects. A total of 1000 eligible patients from 5 tertiary hospitals across China were divided into three groups: standard TET combined with conventional management (Arm A, n=500), conventional management alone (Arm B, n=300), and high-intensity TET combined with conventional management (Arm C, n=200). All operators received unified training and quantitative operational parameters were adopted to reduce research heterogeneity. Outcome indicators included Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), functional scales, quality of life scales, inflammatory cytokines and neurotrophic factors, with a 24-week observation and 6-month follow-up. Results showed that at the 12th week, the mean NRS reduction of Arm A, B and C was 31.8, 22.0 and 37.9 points respectively. Standardized TETs significantly relieved pain, improved physical function and quality of life, and down-regulated inflammatory factors while up-regulating neurotrophic factors. The weekly treatment frequency of twice was confirmed as the optimal regimen with an obvious ceiling effect in high-frequency intervention. Operation standardization was an independent positive predictor of clinical efficacy. The adverse reactions of TETs were mild and transient, and the intervention had good cost-effectiveness. In conclusion, standardized TETs combined with conventional management is an effective, safe and economically superior regimen for chronic soft tissue pain. The established quantitative standard system effectively solves the problem of poor repeatability of TCM external therapies, which is worthy of clinical popularization and further international research and promotion.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdz:curmsc:v:5:y:2026:i:3:p:36-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.paradigmpress.org/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.