Author
Abstract
Background: Chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP) represents a leading global cause of disability. Long-term pharmacological management is restricted by various adverse effects, while complementary acupuncture-moxibustion is widely applied in clinical practice. High-quality three-arm randomized trials quantifying the incremental benefit of supplementary moxibustion remain scarce, and correlations between clinical gains and systemic inflammatory changes require further clinical verification. Objective: This trial aimed to evaluate incremental clinical benefits of adding moxibustion to standardized acupuncture relative to acupuncture monotherapy and conventional rehabilitation, and explore potential correlations between symptom improvement and peripheral inflammatory fluctuations. Methods: This prospective single-center assessor-blinded three-arm randomized trial was performed following CONSORT 2010 and STRICTA 2010 guidelines, prospectively registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR240008569, registration date: March 12, 2024; recruitment initiated from March 15, 2024 to September 30, 2024; final follow-up finished March 2025). A total of 156 eligible participants were randomized at a 1:1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was adjusted between-group difference in week-8 NRS change from baseline. Secondary endpoints included ODI, PSQI, EQ-5D-5L, PGIC, weekly paracetamol consumption and serum hs-CRP, IL-6, TNF-α. Intention-to-treat (ITT) served as primary analysis set, per-protocol (PP) for sensitivity analysis (Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network, 2023); multiple imputation with 20 chained datasets was adopted for missing values. Linear mixed-effects model and ANCOVA corrected for baseline covariates; Bonferroni correction was applied for secondary outcome pairwise comparisons. Results: Among 192 screened patients, 36 were excluded and 156 randomized. Eleven participants dropped out within the 8-week intervention, with another six lost to follow-up from week 8 to week 24; 145 completed 8-week treatment and 139 finished the final 24-week follow-up. All baseline indicators were balanced across three groups (all P>0.05). At week 8, combined therapy yielded superior NRS reduction versus acupuncture alone (adjusted MD = −1.18, 95% CI: −1.74 to −0.62, P
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdz:curmsc:v:5:y:2026:i:3:p:21-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.paradigmpress.org/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.