IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdz/arasoc/v5y2026i1p39-45.html

The Differences in Parents’ Involvement Methods During Children’s Piano Learning and Their Impacts

Author

Listed:
  • Liuyi Chen

    (Manhattan School of Music, US)

  • Yidong Lin

    (University of Manchester, UK)

Abstract

With the comprehensive implementation of quality education in China, piano learning has become an important choice for children’s artistic enlightenment. As the core participants in children’s piano learning process, parents’ participation styles vary, and these differences have a profound impact on children’s learning outcomes, interest development, and mental health. This paper combines literature review and empirical research to classify parents’ participation styles into three types: controlling, accompanying, and permissive. Moving beyond descriptive categorization, this study systematically analyzes the multi-dimensional mechanisms through which these modalities mediate children’s motivation, technical mastery, and emotional safety. By addressing the structural “feedback vacuum” inherent in early instrumental practice, the study deduces an optimal path for supportive participation. It argues that shifting the parental role from a technical micromanager to a meta-cognitive facilitator is crucial for sustained musical development, providing actionable insights for optimizing the family-based music education ecosystem. Multiple main body coordinated intervention can effectively promote.

Suggested Citation

  • Liuyi Chen & Yidong Lin, 2026. "The Differences in Parents’ Involvement Methods During Children’s Piano Learning and Their Impacts," Art and Society, Paradigm Academic Press, vol. 5(1), pages 39-45, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdz:arasoc:v:5:y:2026:i:1:p:39-45
    DOI: 10.63593/AS.2709-9830.2026.03.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.paradigmpress.org/as/article/view/2135/1978
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.63593/AS.2709-9830.2026.03.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdz:arasoc:v:5:y:2026:i:1:p:39-45. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.paradigmpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.