IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdz/arasoc/v4y2025i8p69-81.html

Social Mirror and Identity Performance: An Art-Sociological Interpretation of the Donor Portraits in Dunhuang

Author

Listed:
  • Beiru Tang

    (School of Fine Arts, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China)

Abstract

From the perspective of art sociology, the study of Dunhuang donor portraits reveals a dichotomy between two paradigms: the “Art-Society” paradigm, which uncovers their nature as a mirror of social structure, and the “Art-Sociology” paradigm, which focuses on the performative practice of image-making in the display of secular identity. This paper employs these two paradigms to interpret two aspects of Dunhuang donor portraits. First, at the level of social mirroring, the system of Dunhuang donor portraits is essentially a visual projection of the social structure of Dunhuang during the late Tang and Five Dynasties period; their sequence, spatial arrangement, and symbolic system multidimensionally reflect the local power structure dominated by powerful families. Second, at the level of identity performance, using Goffman’s Dramaturgical Theory to deconstruct the performativity of patronage acts reveals that these powerful families used Buddhist worship as a “Front Stage,” transforming religious space into a field for displaying secular authority. Adopting this dual perspective, and building upon the first two levels of Panofsky’s iconological method, this study delves into the third level—iconological interpretation—to analyze the logic by which Dunhuang’s powerful families constructed power through patronage acts.

Suggested Citation

  • Beiru Tang, 2025. "Social Mirror and Identity Performance: An Art-Sociological Interpretation of the Donor Portraits in Dunhuang," Art and Society, Paradigm Academic Press, vol. 4(8), pages 69-81, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdz:arasoc:v:4:y:2025:i:8:p:69-81
    DOI: 10.63593/AS.2709-9830.2025.09.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.paradigmpress.org/as/article/view/1808/1643
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.63593/AS.2709-9830.2025.09.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdz:arasoc:v:4:y:2025:i:8:p:69-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.paradigmpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.