IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdz/arasoc/v4y2025i4p18-25.html

Corset Revival and the Feminist Reframing of Restrictive Dress in Vintage Fashion Communities

Author

Listed:
  • Amelia Fairchild

    (University of Gloucestershire, United Kingdom)

Abstract

This paper explores the contemporary revival of the corset within vintage fashion communities and its complex relationship with feminist thought. Once condemned as a symbol of patriarchal oppression and bodily restriction, the corset has been reinterpreted by modern wearers as a tool of aesthetic agency, self-expression, and identity formation. Through a critical examination of historical narratives, digital fashion subcultures, and intersectional feminist discourse, the study analyzes how the corset functions simultaneously as a site of historical memory and contemporary resistance. Drawing on theories of body politics, feminist historiography, and subcultural style, the paper demonstrates that corset-wearing today is deeply contextual and politically plural—shaped by the overlapping forces of gender, race, class, disability, and queerness. It concludes that vintage fashion communities serve as key catalysts for this reclamation, transforming restrictive dress from a symbol of conformity into one of empowerment and feminist reimagination.

Suggested Citation

  • Amelia Fairchild, 2025. "Corset Revival and the Feminist Reframing of Restrictive Dress in Vintage Fashion Communities," Art and Society, Paradigm Academic Press, vol. 4(4), pages 18-25, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:bdz:arasoc:v:4:y:2025:i:4:p:18-25
    DOI: 10.63593/AS.2709-9830.2025.05.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.paradigmpress.org/as/article/view/1635/1462
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.63593/AS.2709-9830.2025.05.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdz:arasoc:v:4:y:2025:i:4:p:18-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.paradigmpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.