IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdz/arasoc/v1y2022i3p52-59.html

A Comparative Study of Community Dance Management Models in Australia and China—Beijing and Tasmania as an Example

Author

Listed:
  • Yuying Dai

    (School of Arts, Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology University)

Abstract

Community dance is a socialized expression of urban life. Using a literature research approach, this paper compares the community dance management models in Beijing and Tasmania and finds that there are differences in the development process of community dance in the two cities: the degree of government support, the professionalization of the management organization system, and the value orientation. In addition, the study proposes suggestions for improving the management of community dance in China. The management of community dance in China can improve its management effectiveness in three ways: integrating cultural atmosphere and policy guidance resources, stimulating multiple social forces to participate in community dance, and broadening funding sources and enhancing the social power of community dance, so as to promote a more benign development of community dance as a public art form in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuying Dai, 2022. "A Comparative Study of Community Dance Management Models in Australia and China—Beijing and Tasmania as an Example," Art and Society, Paradigm Academic Press, vol. 1(3), pages 52-59, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:bdz:arasoc:v:1:y:2022:i:3:p:52-59
    DOI: 10.56397/AS.2022.12.06
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.paradigmpress.org/as/article/view/377/326
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.56397/AS.2022.12.06?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdz:arasoc:v:1:y:2022:i:3:p:52-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.paradigmpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.