IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdz/arasoc/v1y2022i2p23-32.html

Generation Z’s Opinion About Sustainability of Office Buildings

Author

Listed:
  • Maximilian Wolf

    (Corporate Management and Human Resources, University of Applied Sciences Albstadt-Sigmaringen, Sigmaringen, Germany)

  • Anja Kluge

    (Kluges Konzept, Munich, Germany)

Abstract

Currently, there are hardly any studies that evaluate the topic of sustainable construction of office buildings from the viewpoint of Generation Z (born between 1995 and 2010) as future users. This article answers the question of how important sustainability is to Generation Z with respect to office buildings. To answer the question, the research uses primary data obtained among 58 Generation Z representatives in Germany in 2022. Survey participants were asked to evaluate an adapted model used by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Nachhaltiges Bauen (German Sustainable Building Council) to certify companies with regard to the sustainability of their office buildings. In summary, our study indicates that German Generation Z respondents want to move safely in energy-efficient office buildings that have sufficient daylight, high indoor air quality, and offer comfortable temperature in all seasons. The needs for autonomy, relatedness and competence correlate significantly with these characteristics, which are particularly important to them. Meaning that these could also be satisfied by an optimal design of the office building.

Suggested Citation

  • Maximilian Wolf & Anja Kluge, 2022. "Generation Z’s Opinion About Sustainability of Office Buildings," Art and Society, Paradigm Academic Press, vol. 1(2), pages 23-32, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdz:arasoc:v:1:y:2022:i:2:p:23-32
    DOI: 10.56397/AS.2022.10.04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.paradigmpress.org/as/article/view/245/212
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.56397/AS.2022.10.04?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdz:arasoc:v:1:y:2022:i:2:p:23-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.paradigmpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.