IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdz/arasoc/v1y2022i1p16-36.html

Assessing Frederic Lamond’s Interpretation of Beethoven’s Piano Sonata No. 23, Op. 57 (Appassionata)

Author

Listed:
  • Fangyuan Chen

    (School of Music, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, United Kingdom)

Abstract

It is well-established that Beethoven has a very important position in classical music, the ‘Appassionata’ Sonata is one of Beethoven’s most famous sonatas. This study aims to examine the first movement of Beethoven’s ‘Appassionata’ and gain an in-depth understanding of it through the analysis of a recording of Frederic Lamond’s 1927 performance and his score, which was published in 1923. By studying the performance of different players in the performance of this sonata, specifically in the uniqueness of Lamond’s playing, as was discovered in this essay. It could have a deeper understanding of this piece. This finding shows that Lamond has a definite rhythm marked on the score, but the rhythm in his recordings is erratic. Lamond has great finger control and technique, and he uses his finger technique very well in some difficult parts of the performance. In his scores, he annotated many dynamic markers, such as staccato, continuous lines, accents, crescendos and crescendos, etc. In his recordings, he shows it all with his finger skills. Such analysis gives us an idea of Lamond’s version. These results suggest that analyzing the notation and performance, it shows that no matter how Lamond’s himself playing style is, he has his own musical ideas. Lamond’s music is very romantic, based on the relevant notation on the score, and his recordings have their own character, which is related to his learning experience.

Suggested Citation

  • Fangyuan Chen, 2022. "Assessing Frederic Lamond’s Interpretation of Beethoven’s Piano Sonata No. 23, Op. 57 (Appassionata)," Art and Society, Paradigm Academic Press, vol. 1(1), pages 16-36, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdz:arasoc:v:1:y:2022:i:1:p:16-36
    DOI: 10.56397/AS.2022.08.04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.paradigmpress.org/as/article/view/94/84
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.56397/AS.2022.08.04?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdz:arasoc:v:1:y:2022:i:1:p:16-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.paradigmpress.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.