IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdy/modfin/v3y2025i3p112-132id327.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Could ChatGPT have earned abnormal returns? A retrospective test from the U.S. stock market

Author

Listed:
  • Marc LoGrasso

Abstract

This paper attempts to assess the ability of OpenAI’s ChatGPT to provide high-quality recommendations for a casual investor looking to beat the market. Going back to 1985 and instructing the GPT-4 model to restrict its knowledge to only what could have been known at the time of stock selection, the GPT-4 model was able to average alphas of approximately 1% per month for two-year holding periods beginning July 1 every year from 1985 to 2021. These abnormal returns persisted after controlling for size, book-to-market, profitability robustness, investment approach, and intermediate- and long-term prior returns. Individual portfolio alphas are only positive and significant about one out of four years but are never negative and significant. This paper also illustrates some of the precision needed to induce the GPT-4 model to provide any recommendations and briefly assesses the asset allocation strategy it appears to pursue.

Suggested Citation

  • Marc LoGrasso, 2025. "Could ChatGPT have earned abnormal returns? A retrospective test from the U.S. stock market," Modern Finance, Modern Finance Institute, vol. 3(3), pages 112-132.
    • Handle: RePEc:bdy:modfin:v:3:y:2025:i:3:p:112-132:id:327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://mf-journal.com/article/view/327
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdy:modfin:v:3:y:2025:i:3:p:112-132:id:327. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Adam Zaremba (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://mf-journal.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.