Author
Abstract
Purpose: This article aims to examine the strategic competition between the United States and China in the Mekong subregion from 2009 to 2024, focusing specifically on its implications for Vietnam. Methodology: As the largest downstream nation in the Mekong River basin, Vietnam is uniquely positioned as both highly vulnerable to upstream actions and influential within regional diplomacy. The analysis employs a multi-dimensional analytical framework to assess contrasting strategies by the U.S. and China. It examines institutional engagement, infrastructure investment, and environmental diplomacy, focusing specifically on mechanisms such as the Mekong–U.S. Partnership and Lancang–Mekong Cooperation. Findings: The study finds that the United States has emphasized transparency, multilateralism, and sustainable development through initiatives like the Mekong–U.S. Partnership. In contrast, China has strategically projected influence through the Lancang–Mekong Cooperation, primarily by using dam construction, concessional loans, and strategic political communication. Vietnam, navigating this competition, has effectively leveraged both frameworks to advance its national interests but continues to confront critical challenges regarding water security, institutional coordination, and maintaining geopolitical equilibrium. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The article recommends that Vietnam pursue strategic policies aimed at enhancing its autonomy, bolstering environmental resilience, and strengthening its regional leadership role. These include proactive diplomatic engagement, improved institutional coherence, and careful balancing of relationships with both major powers.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojtjir:v:5:y:2025:i:1:p:1-11:id:3413. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/JIR/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.