IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/ojtjir/v4y2024i2p56-67id2599.html

Media Framing of Conflict: Exploring Its Influence on International Perception in Turkey

Author

Listed:
  • Emine Arslan

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to analyze the media framing of conflict: exploring its influence on international perception. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: Media framing of conflict in Turkey significantly shapes international perceptions. The study found that Turkish media often portrays conflicts through a nationalistic lens, prioritizing government narratives and emphasizing Turkey's role as a regional power. This framing influences how Turkey is perceived globally, aligning with official policies and agendas. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Agenda-setting theory, framing theory & social identity theory may be used to anchor future studies on the media framing of conflict: exploring its influence on international perception. Media practitioners should prioritize ethical reporting practices that promote balanced and nuanced coverage of conflicts, avoiding sensationalism and bias. Policymakers and international organizations should recognize the significant role of media framing in shaping international perceptions of conflicts and incorporate this understanding into conflict resolution strategies and diplomatic initiatives.

Suggested Citation

  • Emine Arslan, 2024. "Media Framing of Conflict: Exploring Its Influence on International Perception in Turkey," Journal of International Relations, IPRJB, vol. 4(2), pages 56-67.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:ojtjir:v:4:y:2024:i:2:p:56-67:id:2599
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iprjb.org/journals/JIR/article/view/2599
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojtjir:v:4:y:2024:i:2:p:56-67:id:2599. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/JIR/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.