IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/ojtjcm/v4y2024i2p49-51id2626.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ethnic Conflict Resolution in Post-Conflict Societies in Bosnia

Author

Listed:
  • Ajla Begić

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to analyze ethnic conflict resolution in post-conflict societies in Bosnia. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: Studies on ethnic conflict resolution in post-conflict Bosnia emphasize intergroup dialogue, economic development, and transitional justice. Contact initiatives foster trust, while economic empowerment reduces tensions. Truth and reconciliation processes acknowledge past wrongs, and diaspora involvement aids peacebuilding. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Identity theory, contact theory & structural violence theory may be used to anchor future studies on ethnic conflict resolution in post-conflict societies in Bosnia. Practitioners should prioritize initiatives that promote interethnic dialogue, reconciliation, and community engagement at the grassroots level. Policymakers must prioritize inclusive governance structures that ensure the meaningful participation of all ethnic groups in decision-making processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Ajla Begić, 2024. "Ethnic Conflict Resolution in Post-Conflict Societies in Bosnia," Journal of Conflict Management, IPRJB, vol. 4(2), pages 49-51.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:ojtjcm:v:4:y:2024:i:2:p:49-51:id:2626
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/JCM/article/view/2626
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojtjcm:v:4:y:2024:i:2:p:49-51:id:2626. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/JCM/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.