IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/ojtjcm/v1y2017i1p49-61id556.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relationship between incorporating gender mainstreaming in conflict management process and peace sustainability

Author

Listed:
  • Eunice M. Ndonga

Abstract

At the international level norms and commitments have been developed to ensure that gender mainstreaming issues re included in conflict management processes and post conflict recovery. The first UN articulation linking gender equality to peace was the 1975 UN Conference on Women in Mexico City, and later the 1979 Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) which defined discrimination against women and set up an agenda for national actions. The Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action in 1995 highlighted several gender specific impacts of armed conflict on women and girls. Paragraph 135 of the Platform reads, "while entire communities suffer the consequences of armed conflict and terrorism, women and girls are particularly affected because of their status in society and their sex". The adoption of the UN Security Council Resolution 1325 on "˜Women, Peace and Security' in October 2000 called for the incorporation of gender perspectives in all areas of conflict and peace management, a major concept shift that recognized women in international law as active agents in peace building and development rather than merely as victims of war. The research was purely qualitative. Desktop literature review was conducted. Critical analysis of the literature was conducted.

Suggested Citation

  • Eunice M. Ndonga, 2017. "Relationship between incorporating gender mainstreaming in conflict management process and peace sustainability," Journal of Conflict Management, IPRJB, vol. 1(1), pages 49-61.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:ojtjcm:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:49-61:id:556
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/JCM/article/view/556
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojtjcm:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:49-61:id:556. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/JCM/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.