Author
Abstract
Purpose: To aim of the study was to analyze the role of biosecurity measures in controlling infectious diseases in poultry farms in Thailand. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: In Thailand, stringent biosecurity measures are pivotal in curbing infectious diseases in poultry farms. These measures, including controlled farm access, equipment disinfection, waste management, and quarantine protocols for new birds, effectively reduce the incidence and transmission of diseases like avian influenza and Newcastle disease. Government regulations and industry support bolster these efforts, emphasizing collaboration to ensure robust disease prevention. Challenges such as cost constraints and varying compliance levels underscore the ongoing need for innovation and improved practices to safeguard the poultry industry and ensure sustainable production. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Health belief model (HBM), systems theory & social cognitive theory (SCT) may be used to anchor future studies on role of biosecurity measures in controlling infectious diseases in poultry farms in Thailand. Practice-oriented contributions emphasize ongoing training programs for farm workers and stakeholders to ensure effective implementation and compliance with biosecurity protocols. Biosecurity practices contribute to policy development by informing the formulation of regulatory standards and guidelines that mandate minimum biosecurity requirements for poultry farms.
Suggested Citation
Nisarat Nontapan, 2024.
"Role of Biosecurity Measures in Controlling Infectious Diseases in Poultry Farms in Thailand,"
Journal of Animal Health, IPRJB, vol. 4(2), pages 51-62.
Handle:
RePEc:bdu:ojtjah:v:4:y:2024:i:2:p:51-62:id:2768
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojtjah:v:4:y:2024:i:2:p:51-62:id:2768. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/JAH/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.