IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/ojtijs/v8y2024i3p24-35id2831.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of Gender Pay Gap on Workplace Productivity and Employee Morale in Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Charlotte Emily

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the study was to analyze the impact of gender pay gap on workplace productivity and employee morale in Canada. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: The gender pay gap in Canada negatively affects workplace productivity and employee morale. Disparities in pay can reduce motivation and engagement, leading to lower productivity and higher turnover. Female employees, in particular, experience decreased job satisfaction and trust in organizational fairness, affecting overall morale. This gap also hampers an organization's ability to attract and retain talent, impacting its effectiveness. Addressing pay equity is essential for improving productivity and maintaining a positive work environment. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Equity theory, social identity theory & motivation-hygiene theory may be used to anchor future studies on analyze the impact of gender pay gap on workplace productivity and employee morale in Canada. Transparent pay practices involve openly sharing information about salary ranges, promotion criteria, and compensation decisions within an organization. Implementing gender pay gap reporting requirements at a policy level mandates that organizations disclose data on gender-specific pay disparities.

Suggested Citation

  • Charlotte Emily, 2024. "Impact of Gender Pay Gap on Workplace Productivity and Employee Morale in Canada," International Journal of Sociology, IPRJB, vol. 8(3), pages 24-35.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:ojtijs:v:8:y:2024:i:3:p:24-35:id:2831
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJS/article/view/2831
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojtijs:v:8:y:2024:i:3:p:24-35:id:2831. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJS/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.