IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/ojtijp/v9y2024i4p44-65id2890.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relationship between Equine-Assisted Psychotherapy and Client-Therapist Attachment on Symptom Reduction

Author

Listed:
  • Kelly Tobin
  • Anthony Napoli

Abstract

Purpose: The current study examines the efficacy of Equine-assisted Psychotherapy (EAP), an alternative form of treatment for individuals who struggle to connect with traditional forms of therapy, with Traditional Psychotherapy (TP).The purpose of this quantitative quasi-experimental study was to determine if attachment to a therapist differs between the method of treatment (EAP v TP) and if the attachment has an impact on levels of anxiety and levels of depression in participants. Methodology: The study employed a non-randomized Quasi-Experimental two-group design. Participants who received TP (n = 45) or EAP (n = 45) were administered the Client Attachment to Therapist Scale, the Beck Anxiety Inventory, and the Beck Depression Inventory-II. The research questions were tested using a mixed design 2 (treatment group [EAP v PT]) x 2 (Pretest /Post-test) ANOVA. Findings: The results indicated both of treatment conditions produced significant and beneficial changes in Attachment, Anxiety, and Depression from Pretest to Post-test. In addition, significant Group x Time interactions indicated the EAP group achieved significantly greater symptoms reduction over time.

Suggested Citation

  • Kelly Tobin & Anthony Napoli, 2024. "The Relationship between Equine-Assisted Psychotherapy and Client-Therapist Attachment on Symptom Reduction," International Journal of Psychology, IPRJB, vol. 9(4), pages 44-65.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:ojtijp:v:9:y:2024:i:4:p:44-65:id:2890
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJP/article/view/2890
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojtijp:v:9:y:2024:i:4:p:44-65:id:2890. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJP/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.