Author
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to analyze the effectiveness of actuarial models in predicting insurance claims in Germany. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: Actuarial models in Germany effectively predict insurance claims by leveraging extensive historical data and advanced statistical techniques. They assess risks like mortality, morbidity, and catastrophic events crucial for pricing and underwriting decisions. Challenges include continuous recalibration for changing conditions and regulatory shifts. Integration of technologies like machine learning enhances their predictive power against complex risk scenarios. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Theory of Bayesian statistics, theory of generalized linear models (GLMs) & theory of machine learning may be used to anchor future studies on analyze the effectiveness of actuarial models in predicting insurance claims in Germany. Insurers should prioritize investments in data governance frameworks to ensure data accuracy, completeness, and timeliness. Robust data quality assurance practices are essential for optimizing actuarial model effectiveness and decision-making processes. Policymakers should collaborate with industry stakeholders to develop regulatory frameworks that support the adoption of advanced modeling techniques.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojjsar:v:8:y:2024:i:2:p:42-52:id:2763. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/JSAR/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.