IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/ojjsar/v1y2016i1p12-23id86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison of Prices Generated by The Derivative Commodity Model (Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Process) With Those Obtained by The Conventional Arbitrage-Free Method of Pricing Forward Derivatives with Respect to Tea in Nduti Tea Factory Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Patrick MUMU

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the prices generated by the derivative commodity model with those obtained by the conventional arbitrage-free method of pricing forward derivatives with respect to tea.Methodology: The study used descriptive survey research design. The study used descriptive survey research design. This study used secondary data which was collected from Nduti Tea Factory website. The target population of the study were 318 auction days auction days on the stock exchange spread over from 18/12/2007 to 2/12/2014. Purposive sampling was used to select 6 working days excluding Sundays and holidays starting from 18/12/2014 to 2/12/2014.Data from the websites was analysed using the Ornstein Uhlenbeck process, to derive descriptive results.Results: The findings implied that there was variations in forward prices calculated by derivative commodity model as compared to those calculated conventional arbitrage-free.Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: The study provides need to insuring farmers from uncertainty by ensuring they get value for the input and costs of production. On the other hand, consumers are protected from the volatile food commodity prices. An incentive for the farmer is established and hence increased and more efficient productivity is witnessed. The study will lead to designing a simple commodity derivative with different times to expiry for tea in Kenya and elsewhere based on estimated future market prices. The results of this study will be of particular significance to farmers, cooperatives and general investors.

Suggested Citation

  • Patrick MUMU, 2016. "A Comparison of Prices Generated by The Derivative Commodity Model (Ornstein-Uhlenbeck Process) With Those Obtained by The Conventional Arbitrage-Free Method of Pricing Forward Derivatives with Respec," Journal of Statistics and Actuarial Research, IPRJB, vol. 1(1), pages 12-23.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:ojjsar:v:1:y:2016:i:1:p:12-23:id:86
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/JSAR/article/view/86
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojjsar:v:1:y:2016:i:1:p:12-23:id:86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/JSAR/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.