IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/ojjppa/v5y2020i1p35-46id1047.html

Protection Of Civilians And Counter-Terrorism As Human Security Dialogue Of The 21st Century

Author

Listed:
  • Francis M. Kabosha

Abstract

Purpose: If human security as defined in the United Nations Development report of 1994, entails shifting the focus from the state security and its interests to the broadest sense of the security of ordinary people and their interests, then the sanctioning of Protection of Civilians (PoC) mandate in peacekeeping missions in 1999, and the counter-terrorism efforts beginning 2005, through to the creation of the United Nations Office of Counter-Terrorism in June 2017 by the General Assembly Resolution 71/291, this article purports that these expansions have deepened and widened the meaning of human security. Methodology: The discussion of the three interdependent concepts has heavily relied on secondary data, to demonstrate that there has been an expanded interpretation of both PoC and counter-terrorism in policy and implementation. Findings: This article argues that, with the shift from state security to individual security, and from traditional military approach to transformative anti-terrorism strategies, human security narrative has enormously expanded to include every aspect of human fears, needs and priorities. Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: For the union to be effective, it is recommended that all the three concepts should be grounded in human rights approaches, supported by organizational and inter-institution coherence and coordination.

Suggested Citation

  • Francis M. Kabosha, 2020. "Protection Of Civilians And Counter-Terrorism As Human Security Dialogue Of The 21st Century," Journal of Public Policy and Administration, IPRJB, vol. 5(1), pages 35-46.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:ojjppa:v:5:y:2020:i:1:p:35-46:id:1047
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iprjb.org/journals/JPPA/article/view/1047
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojjppa:v:5:y:2020:i:1:p:35-46:id:1047. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/JPPA/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.