IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/ojjpid/v2y2017i1p12-27id479.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Baseline Assessment Of Recipients Of Opct Program In Kibera Informal Settlements

Author

Listed:
  • Amanda Kinya Mbabu
  • Dr. Casper Masiga
  • Dr. Grace Okong'o

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to conduct a baseline assessment of recipients of OPCT program in Kibera informal settlements Methodology: The exploratory design was considered appropriate for this study. Random sampling was used to select 50 respondents (15men, 35women) OPCT beneficiaries who were not members of KDC and 20 members of KDC. Random sampling was ideal because each respondent of the target population had an equal chance of being selected. Purposive sampling was used to identify 5 key informants. Results: The study found out that there were more women compared to men in the OPCT program. The study noted that the OPCT beneficiaries were 65 years and above, which showed adherence to the objective selection criteria. It was observed further that majority of the elderly OPCT beneficiaries also suffered from chronic diseases such as tuberculosis, high blood pressure and diabetes. Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: To the recipients of OPCT, they should be sensitized and ensure they follow the required protocol so that they can avoid being struck off the register, and form welfare groups where they can socialize, share, enlighten each other, make friends and even champion their rights.

Suggested Citation

  • Amanda Kinya Mbabu & Dr. Casper Masiga & Dr. Grace Okong'o, 2017. "A Baseline Assessment Of Recipients Of Opct Program In Kibera Informal Settlements," Journal of Poverty, Investment and Development, IPRJB, vol. 2(1), pages 12-27.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:ojjpid:v:2:y:2017:i:1:p:12-27:id:479
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/JPID/article/view/479
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojjpid:v:2:y:2017:i:1:p:12-27:id:479. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: journals@iprjb.org (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/JPID/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.