Author
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the study was to analyze the modern media’s influence on the evolution of traditional religious and philosophical beliefs in South Africa. Methodology: This study adopted a desk methodology. A desk study research design is commonly known as secondary data collection. This is basically collecting data from existing resources preferably because of its low cost advantage as compared to a field research. Our current study looked into already published studies and reports as the data was easily accessed through online journals and libraries. Findings: Modern media significantly reshapes traditional religious and philosophical beliefs by democratizing access to information and fostering global dialogue. Studies indicate that digital platforms encourage reinterpretation of sacred texts and philosophical concepts, leading to more inclusive and pluralistic belief systems. At the same time, the rapid spread of simplified narratives can fragment complex doctrines and intensify ideological polarization. Research shows that increased online engagement correlates with both enhanced critical thinking and the reinforcement of established ideological boundaries. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: Social constructionism, diffusion of innovations & media dependency theory may be used to anchor future studies on modern media’s influence on the evolution of traditional religious and philosophical beliefs in South Africa. Integrating traditional beliefs into educational curricula fosters critical thinking and cultural literacy. Policymakers can develop frameworks that both protect minority cultural practices and allow for adaptive transformation, ensuring that policies are responsive to the needs of diverse communities.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojjpcr:v:8:y:2025:i:1:p:36-44:id:3230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/JPCR/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.