Author
Listed:
- P Kandie
- M. Kipmerewo
- B Mukabana
- J Arudo
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the association between individual factors and maternal and fetal outcomes among mothers referred with obstetric emergencies. Methodology: A descriptive cross-sectional study which employed a mixed method approach of data collection was adopted. Simple Random technique was used in selecting 284 respondents into the study. The study population also included nurses, gynaecologist and medical officers who were purposively sampled. Qualitative data collection was analysed through content analysis while descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analysed quantitative data. Findings: The odds were lower for Neonates of mothers who did not have complications immediately post-delivery (OR:0.2;95% CI: 0.1-.8; P=0.01) compared with mothers who had complications. Neonates whose mothers received haematinics and IPT had 50% lower rate of complications than those who did not(OR:0.5;95% CI:0.2-1.0;P=0.04).The odds of abnormal births were higher for mothers without any income compared to those with some income (OR:1.7;95% CI 1.0-2.7;P=0.04).Moreover, neonates of mothers with no or with primary education were 1.7 times more likely to have had abnormal outcome (OR:1.7;95% CI 1.0-2.9;P=0.03)than those cases where the mother had secondary education and above. Further results show that women who decided by themselves to attend ANC were 95.5% less likely to have had complications (OR:0.4;95%CI:0.1; -1.0P=0.07). Gestational age of less than 39 weeks was associated with an increase in the odds of having maternal complications with up to 10.4 times likelihood of having complications (OR:0.4;95% CI:O.1; P=0.07) Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: This study has identified individual factors influencing maternal and fetal outcomes of obstetric emergencies in a marginalized county. The findings will provide insight to policy makers at the county level hence informed interventions will be made. The study will also form a basis for other researchers because no literature review has been published on this topic at the study site.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojjhmn:v:6:y:2021:i:1:p:53-67:id:1217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/JHMN/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.