IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/ojijlp/v1y2017i1p52-63id330.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Legal Gaps Facing Implementation Of Eacc Mandate On Weeding Out Corruption Cases

Author

Listed:
  • Joachim Njagi

Abstract

Purpose: The main purpose of this study was to determine the Legal Gaps Facing Implementation of EACC Mandate on Weeding out Corruption Cases.Methodology: The study employed a desktop descriptive survey research design thus presenting a methodological gap.Results: The results conclude that lack of EACC based courts, lack of prosecutorial powers, lack of general good will, bureaucracy had a significant effect on EACC mandate on weeding out corruption cases. The study thus recommends for more rigorous revaluation for its mandate. Thus further studies should be based on the role of parliament in strengthening EACC Mandate on Weeding out Corruption CasesUnique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: The study thus recommends for more rigorous revaluation for its mandate. Thus further studies should be based on the role of parliament in strengthening EACC Mandate on Weeding out Corruption Cases.

Suggested Citation

  • Joachim Njagi, 2017. "Legal Gaps Facing Implementation Of Eacc Mandate On Weeding Out Corruption Cases," International Journal of Law and Policy, IPRJB, vol. 1(1), pages 52-63.
    • Handle: RePEc:bdu:ojijlp:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:52-63:id:330
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJLP/article/view/330
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojijlp:v:1:y:2017:i:1:p:52-63:id:330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJLP/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.