IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/ojijlp/v10y2025i1p1-30id3316.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers to Justice: Investigating the Personal and Professional Challenges Faced by Judges and Lawyers in Somalia: A Case Study in Puntland

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed Ahmed Mohamed

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigates the challenges faced by judges and lawyers in Puntland, Somalia, focusing on how personal and professional obstacles hinder their effectiveness and undermine the integrity and authority of the judicial system. It aims to explore the multifactorial social, cultural, political, and institutional barriers confronting legal professionals in the region. Methodology: A qualitative research design was employed, using in-depth interviews to gather data from legal practitioners in Puntland. The study utilized purposive sampling to gain insights into the lived experiences of judges and lawyers. Findings: The findings reveal that legal practitioners face numerous personal challenges such as emotional stress, threats to physical safety, financial constraints, and work overload. Professionally, they are hindered by insufficient legal resources, outdated infrastructure, and limited training opportunities. Furthermore, judicial independence and impartiality are compromised by political interference and clan-based affiliations, contributing to a weakened justice system. Unique Contribution to Theory and Policy: This study contributes to the existing literature by highlighting the interplay between personal, professional, and socio-political challenges in a fragile legal system. It offers policy recommendations including the enhancement of professional development, promotion of judicial independence, strategic allocation of resources, and reforms to address cultural and political pressures. These measures are essential for building a more transparent, efficient, and fair legal system in Puntland, thus reinforcing the rule of law and democratic governance.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:bdu:ojijlp:v:10:y:2025:i:1:p:1-30:id:3316
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: https://www.iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJLP/article/view/3316
Download Restriction: no
---><---

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojijlp:v:10:y:2025:i:1:p:1-30:id:3316. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJLP/ .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.