IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/ojijlg/v2y2022i1p60-64id1532.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mentorship As Leadership Model: An Empirical Analysis Of Authentic Mentor-Mentee

Author

Listed:
  • Dr. Moi Edna

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study conveys the continuity of leadership in the organization. This is by ensuring that the outgoing leaders who are mentors ensure that upcoming leaders who are mentees would continue with the smooth running of the organization. Mentoring is a holistic concept related to corporate development, personal enhancement, and professional improvement. Methodology: This study utilized a descriptive research design and reviewed available literature by reviewing two major types of mentoring, first the career coach and professional helper mentorship, Secondly, psychological mentoring gives personal and cognitive aspects. Findings: The study found out that these types of mentorships aim at establishing an understanding of a company's operations such as political and cultural organizational aspects and individual support, improving confidence, seeking professional identity, and role modeling. This leads to a model that would help the mentor who is an all-around individual to instill various skills and knowledge on a mentee to improve their general performance. Unique Contribution to Theory, Practice and Policy: This study recommends mentorship be used in any organization as a leadership model to keep the organizational momentum and maintain its status quo. The government and policymakers could document the use of mentorship as a policy for smooth running of institutions to avoid waste of resources and misuse of power to those in leadership as they will be responsible to mentor others. Researchers could deep deeper into this area to add knowledge and filled the gap of poor leadership.

Suggested Citation

  • Dr. Moi Edna, 2022. "Mentorship As Leadership Model: An Empirical Analysis Of Authentic Mentor-Mentee," International Journal of Leadership and Governance, IPRJB, vol. 2(1), pages 60-64.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:ojijlg:v:2:y:2022:i:1:p:60-64:id:1532
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iprjb.org/journals/IJLG/article/view/1532
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojijlg:v:2:y:2022:i:1:p:60-64:id:1532. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/IJLG/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.