IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/ojijlg/v1y2021i2p19-31id1426.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis Of The Viability Of Lifestyle Audit As An Anti-Corruption Tool In Kenya

Author

Listed:
  • Olayo Julius Ochieng PhD, CHRP-K
  • Lewis Waithaka Kamau

Abstract

Purpose: The main objective of this paper was to assess whether lifestyle audit as an anti-corruption tool is viable. Methodology: The study was based on a desk review of existing studies and documented statistics. Further, legal framework and case laws were cited. A narrative analysis was performed and at this point the information was interpreted by comparing the results with the results of other empirical studies. This information was interpreted using the "stories in the stories" and linked to the existing literature. Results: The study found that lifestyle audit is a viable tool for fighting corruption. However, there are challenges in the legal framework, particularly on the implementation. The study noted that the viability of lifestyle audits depends on judicial interpretation, political will and more importantly addressing of the current software and hardware issues existing in the current legal framework. Recommendation: The study calls for political will to ensure the Lifestyle Audit Bill 2019 is not watered down by judicial interpretation. It further recommends that the political will should be accompanied by executive action to fight corruption through wealth declaration.

Suggested Citation

  • Olayo Julius Ochieng PhD, CHRP-K & Lewis Waithaka Kamau, 2021. "Analysis Of The Viability Of Lifestyle Audit As An Anti-Corruption Tool In Kenya," International Journal of Leadership and Governance, IPRJB, vol. 1(2), pages 19-31.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:ojijlg:v:1:y:2021:i:2:p:19-31:id:1426
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJLG/article/view/1426
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojijlg:v:1:y:2021:i:2:p:19-31:id:1426. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJLG/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.