IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/ojijfd/v1y2021i1p40-50id1330.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of teaching methods on competence of fashion and design students

Author

Listed:
  • Henry Mark

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this research was to assess the influence of teaching methods on competence of fashion and design students. Methodology: A qualitative textual evaluation method was used in this research. Textual analysis consists of review and interpretation of scripts and articles and their inferential context. The research involved literature search and paper review of information on silk fashion growth. The study adopted a desktop literature review method (desk study). Results: The study recognized poor students approach to learning creativity; specifically, the non-application of analytical, conceptual and synthesiscal skills in solving problems. It is expedient to re-iterate that tutors are foremost in the education sector and they make the most difference in knowledge acquisition. Tutors should therefore continuously improve on their professional knowledge and practice by exploring creative applications and nurturing students' creativity at every opportunity. It is widely believed that tutors who vary their instruction possess more professional expertise and produce more learning in their students than do tutors who use the same approach to meet all their learning goals. Unique contribution to theory, practice and policy: The study recommend that lecturers should not solely direct their teaching towards attainment of good examination results. Student should be assisted by their lecturers to take up work placements relevant to their programmes of study to enable them to acquire additional competency skills from experts in the industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Henry Mark, 2021. "Influence of teaching methods on competence of fashion and design students," International Journal of Fashion and Design, IPRJB, vol. 1(1), pages 40-50.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:ojijfd:v:1:y:2021:i:1:p:40-50:id:1330
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJFD/article/view/1330
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojijfd:v:1:y:2021:i:1:p:40-50:id:1330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJFD/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.