IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bdu/ojijfa/v2y2017i2p85-106id314.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Study of the Returns of Quoted Sin and Non Sin Stocks at the Nairobi Securities Exchange

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Gachoki Njeru
  • Dr. Herrick Ondigo

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to compare returns of quoted sin and non-sin stocks at the Nairobi Securities Exchange. The major objective of the study was to establish whether stock returns of sin stocks outperform non sin stocks.Methodology: The study used explanatory research design with the population consisting of all firms listed in the NSE. The sample of the study consisted of the top 20 NSE firms. The study grouped 18 firms into the non-sin stock category and another 2 firms (BAT ad EABL) into the sin stock category. Secondary data sources were used in gathering data for analysis which was done using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS version 20) to generate the descriptive statistics and also to generate inferential results.Results: The study found out that sin stocks have higher capital gains, high expected return and dividends than in non-sin stocksUnique contribution to theory, practice and policy: The study recommended that Sin stocks have higher expected returns than comparable stocks; however, neglected they are by norm constrained investors. Therefore, investors should split their investment in sin stock and non-sin stocks.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Gachoki Njeru & Dr. Herrick Ondigo, 2017. "A Comparative Study of the Returns of Quoted Sin and Non Sin Stocks at the Nairobi Securities Exchange," International Journal of Finance and Accounting, IPRJB, vol. 2(2), pages 85-106.
  • Handle: RePEc:bdu:ojijfa:v:2:y:2017:i:2:p:85-106:id:314
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJFA/article/view/314
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bdu:ojijfa:v:2:y:2017:i:2:p:85-106:id:314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chief Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iprjb.org/journals/index.php/IJFA/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.